#Money plus sunset deluxe uk update
By no surprise, many of us have more than two or three accounts, and repeating the cycle over and over again each time we want to update would be less than satisfactory. If you only have a single online account, this option wouldn't be too onerous. In its simplest implementation, the user goes to each of their financial institutions and downloads their latest transactions, subsequently importing the resulting files into Money. Money has a useful import feature, providing a back-door path to gathering online updates. Which of the new-breed software packages will thrive and grow, and which will bite the dust? I have no idea, but I do know that I don't want to be a guinea pig, or lose all my past data. My opinion was (and still is) that keeping Money alive for as long as possible is a better option. Perhaps it would be better to just dump Money and get it over with, going through the pain of a transition rather than implementing a fix. There are a few open-source and free options available as well, but (again) those do not import Money data directly, requiring instead that the user "export" the data and then "import" into the new software (which mostly doesn't work). We also have the option of just starting from scratch, with a different finance package, but there won't be support for importing Money data. I have never tested it myself, but I would guess that it (mostly) works as advertised, and switching to Quicken was likely a palatable option for many users. With the release of Quicken 2010, the full import functionality was (supposedly) implemented. After all, it's not every day that your chief competitor calls it quits. When the Money death bell rang at Microsoft, Intuit quickly began working on an improved import feature for Money users. Quicken isn't a bad option, but it was a step backwards for most Money users. Quicken seemed to be the odds-on favorite to gain traction with many previous Money users.
0 kommentar(er)
